I love that the Bible isn’t perfect
I love that the Bible isn’t perfect. And I love that I can’t read the Bible literally. I can’t view it as a history book. It’s literary not literal to me. I don’t think that I’m off on that. In the Bible Christ himself uses many diverse literary devices to teach. One of his primary methods of gospel teaching is parables. They are inherently just a literary device with layers of meaning. But Christ didn’t start it. If we turn to the Hebrew Bible and the Old Testament we see a variety of literary styles and devices used by various prophets and writers. And I love that. I know some people need the Bible to be absolutely true and literal and inerrant for their faith. I get that. I do. And so what I’m about to launch into isn’t to confront them. But to talk about why my faith is improved by the inconsistencies of our canonical scripture. First. I love imperfection in my art. It just reminds me of our humanity. It’s why I love jazz to classical. Street art and Impressionism to baroque port